Willtellsall.com will be up and running shortly. In the meantime please see past blogs at willtellsall.blogspot.com. This is the most important election in American history and we all must do our part to do our part. This blog and the information I present is how I am doing my part. This blog examines current policy with an emphasis on the constitutionality of the policy. Will is also a seventeen year survivor of severe chronic pain with countless experiences to share with other suffers of chronic nonmalignant pain. Check back soon and share this blog with like minded conservative Americans.
|Wednesday May 2, 2012 10:00PM (MST)
TAGS: Scott Brown, Obama, Ford, GM, Chrylser, Auto Bailout, Obama Stimulus, Public Unions
80% of Stimulus Money in Wisconsin Goes to Public Unions
The defeat of Wisconson republican senate incumbent Scott Brown is apparently the most important economic factor in the state’s recovery. When analyzing use of stimulus money in the state I’m assuming that is the only conclusion most rational minds will come to. Let me restate that. Brown’s reelection is the most important factor to Barack Obama. There is much about the Obama controlled White House’s use of funds to question but his behavior mirrors the beginning of his presidency. The GM/Chrysler bailout early on was not as it seems as explained by Awr Hawkins with Breitbart.com;
“…When Obama pushed through his stimulus package shortly after taking office, the money going to bail out GM andW Chrysler was not so much intended to shore up those corporations as it was intended to shore up the unions at those corporations. In other words, although one of the ubiquitous reasons given was saving these two iconic American companies, the real goal was to pass tax-payer dollars to Democrat-dominated union members (to keep them voting for Democrat candidates for the foreseeable future). In a real sense, this is nothing more than a sophisticated money laundering scheme. [Attribution][Photo Source: http://thegurglingcod.typepad.com/
…The ad, pulled in response to White House questions (and, presumably, carping from rival GM), threatened to rekindle the negative (if accurate) association just when the president wants credit for their positive results (GM and Chrysler are moving forward, making money and selling vehicles) and to distance himself from any public downside of his decision. [Attribution][ Image Source: www.ford.com ]
…But it gets worse. In states like Wisconsin, far from the automakers and their union workers, 80% of stimulus funds “went to public unions.” That means these unions received $600 million in funding which they are now using to fill the coffers of Democrat candidates and to pay for ongoing opposition to Gov. Scott Walker. As a matter of fact, public employee unions have already spent more than $8 million in their effort to recall Walker. What this does, in effect, is remove the advantage Walker had achieved in fundraising by placing the weight of the national purse behind Walker’s opponents.
Al Qaeda Planning to Attack National Forests?
|Wednesday May 2, 2012 10:00PM (MST)
TAGS: Al Qaeda, Obama, Inspire Magazine, Drone Strikes, National Security, War on Terror
President Bill Clinton on President Barack Obama & Bin Laden
Friday a trailer came out for a 17 minute campaign film from the Obama camp. A preview of what’s to come. The campaign video trailer featured a narrative by president Bill Jefferson Clinton who praised the accomplishments of Obama’s action against the Bin Laden compound (Attribution).
I have to bring up a few facts from memory.
In the 2008 primary election Barack Obama accused Hillary Clinton of shamefully using US troops and Bin Laden to advance her campaign. Is Obama not doing the same exact thing with this commercial? According to the GatewayPundit.com;
The Obama campaign lambasted Hillary Clinton in 2008 for using images of Osama Bin Laden in her television ad – “Kitchen.” [Attribution]
According to NationalReview.com;
President Obama, shortly after announcing the killing of Osama bin Laden: “America doesn’t need to trot this stuff out as trophies . . . We don’t need to spike the football.” [Attribution]
Now is Obama using the killing of Bin Laden as a campaign tool and doing exactly that… spiking the football?
What I find interesting is Obama chose President B.J. Clinton to promote this message.
Finally NewBusters.org cleared up something that caused me great confusion;
Despite all the evidence pointing to Clinton ignoring numerous chances to capture or kill bin Laden, the Obama campaign is actually using him quite prominently to make the case that had Romney been president last year, Osama would still be alive. [Attribution]
I remembered correctly -Clinton dropped the ball numerous times by toiling over the decision to kill Bin Laden. This makes Clinton the perfect man to praise Obama for doing what he never had the courage to do… and the direct result of Clinton’s weakness was planes flying into the world trade center. He not only failed to act he created the situation for Obama to step in.
The New Obama Sponsored Egypt
The first signs are coming out about what the new free Egypt will be like. For over thirty years President Hosni Mubarak was a relentless dictator in Egypt and squashed any dissent in his country. Over an astounding 18 day period a leaderless revolution overthrew his governance and gave Egypt back to the people. [See Related Article]
Now “the people” have spoken as the Egyptian Parliament proposes new laws for the Egyptian people. According to Al Arabia News on April 29, 2012;
Egypt’s National Council for Women (NCW) has appealed to the Islamist-dominated parliament not to approve two controversial laws on the minimum age of marriage and allowing a husband to have sex with his dead wife within six hours of her death according to a report in an Egyptian newspaper.
The appeal came in a message sent by Dr. Mervat al-Talawi, head of the NCW, to the Egyptian People’s Assembly Speaker, Dr. Saad al-Katatni, addressing the woes of Egyptian women, especially after the popular uprising that toppled president Hosni Mubarak in February 2011.
She was referring to two laws: one that would legalize the marriage of girls starting from the age of 14 and the other that permits a husband to have sex with his dead wife within the six hours following her death.
According to Egyptian columnist Amro Abdul Samea in al-Ahram, Talawi’s message included an appeal to parliament to avoid the controversial legislations that rid women of their rights of getting education and employment, under alleged religious interpretations.
“Talawi tried to underline in her message that marginalizing and undermining the status of women in future development plans would undoubtedly negatively affect the country’s human development, simply because women represent half the population,” Abdul Samea said in his article. [Click for Full Article]
Do fears the Muslim Brotherhood was behind the overthrow of the Egyptian government still seem unfounded? Legalized marriage at 14? Women’s employment and education under attack? Husbands acting like their wife is a piece of property not a person by condoning men who have sex with their wives up to six hours after death? These are the people our president embraces and apologizes about America’s arrogance to? It’s not arrogant to think one can speak for a whole nation to Islamic Extremist animals?
Two Wrongs Make a Right on the Left
White House Deputy Director of the Office of Public Engagement Brian Bond has a very cozy relationship with Dan Savage. In fact Bond has essentially singlehandedly fundraised for Savage’s anti-bullying program. According to Breitbart.com in regards to the significant fundraising and support Savage has received from the White House;
This is the same Dan Savage who spoke at the National High School Journalism Conference last week, where he ripped into the Bible and called religious students “pansy-assed” for walking out on him.
But there’s much more to Dan Savage than just anti-religious bullying. He’s one of the biggest bullies on the planet. And he’s the point person the White House specifically chose – and fundraised for – in order to push their anti-bullying agenda. [Attribution]
Savage mocked high school students and ostracized them to the rest of the students attending the conference. This falls right in line with most of the messages coming from the White House. Do as I say, not as I do…
The scary part is the number of radicals this president has surrounded himself with. Van Jones, Reverend Wright, and now Dan Savage. Savage bullies anyone who does not agree with his agenda and went so far as to essentially redefine the name Santorum when one does a Google search. There is video of Savage [and several mindless but famous personalities who are probably STRONGLY against bullying] threatening Rick Santorum again this time threatening to redefine his first name on Google searches as well [Attribution]. Savage also volunteered for republican political candidate Gary Bauer just so he could infect the mans campaign with the flu.
Savage licked door knobs all over the campaign headquarters, clean coffee cups, and even handed the republican hopeful a saliva covered pen when asking for an interview [Attribution]. The man is sick… the doorknob licking is enough proof of that but his motivations are irrational. The man is stupid… there are many better ways to sabotage a campaign than to go around licking doorknobs. How’d that work out for you anyhow Dan? Lastly the man is radical, willing to do anything to advance his cause, and an expert at exercising his freedom of speech to limit the freedom of speech of others. Again, the people who scream the loudest for tolerance are the most intolerant people of others who do not share their views. Just Obama’s speed…
See Dan Savage in action: sex-advice-columnist-and-anti-bullying-advocate-dan-savage-curses-hig
The two presidents have a lot in common. Both inherited an American economy in collapse. And both applied daring, expensive remedies. Mr. Reagan passed the biggest tax cut ever, combined with an agenda of deregulation, monetary restraint and spending controls. Mr. Obama, of course, has given us a $1 trillion spending stimulus.
By the end of the summer of Reagan’s third year in office, the economy was soaring. The GDP growth rate was 5% and racing toward 7%, even 8% growth. In 1983 and ’84 output was growing so fast the biggest worry was that the economy would “overheat.” In the summer of 2011 we have an economy limping along at barely 1% growth and by some indications headed toward a “double-dip” recession. By the end of Reagan’s first term, it was Morning in America. Today there is gloomy talk of America in its twilight. [Click for WSJ.com Article]
Obama has provided much cannon fodder for Romney including the multiple statements about Reagan by this administration in an attempt to gain independent voters. All of that can be brought to light as the president is vetted. I can only hope Romney focuses on Obama’s economic record because it has been a disaster. If the primaries are any indication of how Romney will market himself this election cycle… its going to be nasty. There have already been indirect attacks against Romeny such as MSNBC’s allegations about the presidential candidate’s dry religion putting “this great nation in jeopardy”. Romney had better prepare for a slew of attacks, in my last blog “Tea Party Terrorists” I discussed the DNC chair’s attack of millions of Americans, and it will only get worse. If Romney goes the same “negative” rout he will still get my vote but will lose my respect and it will be my goal to support a strong conservative to challenge him in the 2016 primary. I don’t like “if’s” so I will just see how it all plays out.
Unfortunately as it all “plays out” the country is going to a very bad place in a hand-basket. Today reports of the true numbers reflected a much lower drop than the already forecasted fall in GDP. The problem is the recent rise in GDP was inflated with unsustainable government spending. Obama was denied a 2nd stimulus because of a 2010 surprise election. THANK YOU Tea Party or proof of the real damage he has done to this economy would not be reflected in GDP numbers until well after his election. I have a feeling the number would have been well below today’s number of 2.2%. That is what Obama was counting on but he lost his super majority before fighting for a second stimulus. Its obvious to me now he weighed the decision of asking for more money or Obamacare and his choice is why leading democrats like Barney Frank are jumping ship. Hope and change… I sure HOPE we get a CHANGE in the White House.
Will TellDenver, CO
Follow on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012
I don’t cite much [at all actually] in this blog which is not typical for my writing style, but I saw an interview recently that caused my blood to boil. The CNN interview early this week with Congresswoman and DNC chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz [see video below] illustrated again the party’s attitude towards millions of American citizens. During the 2010 elections we heard Pelosi and other leading democrats including the president ridicule the Tea party labeling it radical, extremist, and even dangerous. Pelosi told national news cameras her fears of 60’s style violence from the Tea Party yet there has been no fat for the media to chew. Occupy on the other hand has spread 60’s style violence across America, created massive crime waves in several cities, and exposed countless women to sexual assault. Leading democrats are yet to condemn the disgusting actions of these groups nationwide. Instead Pelosi, Obama, and other leading democrats have endorsed the “Occupy” movement saying they “understand their message”.
The Tea Party has been called radical. When compared to the types of protests leading democrats support such as the Occupy movement… Tea Party rallies are in fact radically different. Wasserman-Schultz said the Tea Party was an extremist group and it makes perfect sense to me why the Democratic National Committee chair would call a group who believes in limited government extremist. Limited government is opposite of what the democrats stand for. And lastly the Tea Party has been called dangerous. Granted no rapes, sexual assaults, or other “Occupy” type violent crimes occur at Tea Party rallies but the group is still dangerous to the democrat’s message.
I could see why these politicians would ostracize millions of their own citizens if the Tea Party was in fact a radical and violent group but the only thing wrong with the Tea Party is democrats don’t like what they stand for. That is not radical, extremist, or dangerous. That is the American way. Checks and balances. It is time for a change in the oval office.
|Tuesday April 24, 2012 12:30PM (MST)TAGS: Medicare Advantage, Obama, Government Accounting Office, Fraud|
I came across this article after listening to the opening segment of the Mark Levin show last night. According to the New York Post [[Click HERE for Full Article]];
The most oppressive aspects of the ObamaCare law don’t kick in until after the 2012 election, when the president will no longer be answerable to voters. More “flexibility,” he recently explained to the Russians.
But certain voters would surely notice one highly painful part of the law before then — namely, the way it guts the popular Medicare Advantage program.
Nothing is more politically volatile than monkeying with the health insurance of seniors, who aren’t too keen on confusing upheavals in their health care and are the most diligent voters in the land. This could make the Tea Party look like a tea party.
This political ticking time bomb could become the biggest “October Surprise” in US political history.
But the administration’s devised a way to postpone the pain one more year, getting Obama past his last election; it plans to spend $8 billion to temporarily restore Medicare Advantage funds so that seniors in key markets don’t lose their trusted insurance program in the middle of Obama’s re-election bid.
The money is to come from funds that Health and Human Services is allowed to use for “demonstration projects.” But to make it legal, HHS has to pretend that it’s doing an “experiment” to study the effect of this money on the insurance market.
That is, to “study” what happens when the government doesn’t change anything but merely continues a program that’s been going on for years.
Obama can temporarily prop up Medicare Advantage long enough to get re-elected by exploiting an obscure bit of federal law. Under a 1967 statute, the HHS secretary can spend money without specific approval by Congress on “experiments” directly aimed at “increasing the efficiency and economy of health services.”
Past demonstration projects have studied new medical techniques or strategies aimed at improving care or reducing costs. The point is to find ways to lower the costs of Medicare by allowing medical technocrats to make efficient decisions without interference from vested interests.
Now Obama means to turn it on its head — diverting the money to a blatantly non-experimental purpose to serve his political needs.
A Government Accounting Office report released this morning shows, quite starkly, that there simply is no experiment being conducted, just money being spent. Understandably, the GAO recommends that HHS cancel the project.
Congress should immediately launch an investigation into this unprecedented misuse of taxpayer money and violation of the public trust, which certainly presses the boundaries of legality and very well may breach them.
If he’s not stopped, Obama will spend $8 billion in taxpayer funds for a scheme to mask the debilitating effects on seniors of his signature piece of legislation just long enough to get himself re-elected.
Now that is some serious audacity.