Obama, SECRETLY Revolutionizing the U.S. Tax System!

Will Tell
Denver, CO

Follow on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012


Tuesday representative Tom McClintock (R) from California’s fourth district spoke on the floor of the house chamber in regards to governments tax laws and behavior therein. Specifically the taxing of nonprofits was the issue the congressman addressed. Over the years we have all heard Obama discuss the need to revolutionize the country’s tax system.  Apparently he did not want to wait for traditional change [other wise knows as proper channels] because some unprecedented changes at the IRS have already taken place without transparecy.  What I found very peculiar was most of the American public was unaware of the changes sweeping the nation. 

For example, under this “progressive” administration the manner in which non-profits and the government interact has been fundamentally changed to reflect the vision Barack Obama has for this country.  As explained by representative McClintock on the floor of the House Chamber April 17th;

In order to be recognized as non-profit groups, these organizations must register with the IRS – a purely ministerial function that has, in the past, been applied evenly and without regard to [the non-profit’s] political views.

At least until now.

Before I go back to representative McClintock’s speech I will point out that using an arm of the government to control, harass, or manipulate a non-profit group based on it’s political alignment is completely unAmerican.  As McClintock stated during his allocated 5 minutes on the floor– there would have never been a civil rights movement if not for non-profit groups.  Groups that have always been very political in nature, why would Obama wish to attack groups like the NAACP and ACLU?  McClintock continues;

 It seems that Tea Party groups are now being treated very differently than their counterparts on the political Left.  For the last two years, many have been stone-walled by the IRS when they have sought to register as non-profits and most recently, they have been barraged with increasingly aggressive and threatening demands vastly outside the legal authority of the IRS.

Rest at ease, it is not the ACLU or NAACP that Obama is terrorizing with the Department of Treasury! Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson need not start up the race war spin cycle.  The only groups targeted by the IRS’s bizarre and unconstitutional behavior are political groups that speak out against our Commander in Chief.  I can smell the lawsuits piling up but none can state what is happening any better than McClintock;

Ironically, the same tactics we now see used by the IRS [Obama’s IRS] against the tea parties were once used by the most abusive of the southern states in the 1950’s to intimidate civil rights groups like the NAACP.

No such tactics have been reported by any similar civic groups on the political left, so the conclusion is inescapable – that this administration is very clearly, very pointedly and very deliberately attempting to intimidate, harass and threaten civic minded groups with which they disagree using one of the most feared and powerful agencies of the United States Government to do so.

The conclusion is inescapable…  As these blogs progress I hope to paint a picture of the vision Barack Obama has for America.  In previous posts I have shown that hypocrisy in the Obama administration.  This Tea Party story tells me one thing… Obama’s vision of America is much different than our founding fathers.  I’m sure Obama’s hero president Lincoln would be disgusted by the presidents use of the IRS to persecute particular groups based on political views.  This country was founded because of political discourse.  The Civil War and Civil Rights movement would have never taken place had it not been for… political discourse in this country.  Now Obama wants to limit that ability for the person or persons who disagree with what his administration decides “for” the people.

”]Obama Pic

It’s obvious to me this is all by design.  The Obama administration underestimated the effectiveness of the Tea Party because they thought most of America agreed with the president’s ideology.  Democrats had their clock cleaned in the 2010 election specifically because of the Tea Party.  Obama has been working on his reelection prior to his first day in office and the IRS’s attack on Tea Party organizations across the nation is proof of that. I can’t summarize any better than representative McClintock did in his speech to congress;

Mr. Speaker, these facts speak for themselves and need no embellishment or interpretation.  They should alarm every American of good will regardless of political philosophy, for if this precedent is allowed to stand, no one’s freedom is safe.  I bring these facts to the attention of the House today and ask that they be rigorously investigated; and if found accurate that those officials responsible be exposed, disgraced, dismissed and debarred from any further position of trust or power within our government.

If you still support this president and his administration I beg of you to consider what has been revealed by representative McClintock. Today the IRS is going after the freedom to assemble and the freedom of speech of “conservatives” and the Tea Party; but tomorrow it can be you when you disagree with what the government tells you to put in your body [or not], how the government wants you to raise your children, or what the government decides you should or shouldn’t say or think.  The possibilities are limitless when government shows tyranny.  I don’t know how to describe what is happening to Tea Party organizations across the nation in any other way.  Tyranny.

-Will Tell
Follow us on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012
Facebook   del.icio.us   MySpace   Google   Reddit   Windows Live   Yahoo! My Web   Gmail   Twitter   Linked in
Posted in Constitution, National News, Obama, Politics, Socialism, Tax Policy, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Geraldo Accuses N.R.A. of “Rightwing” Zealotry

Will Tell
Denver, CO

Follow on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012


Geraldo Accuses N.R.A. of “Rightwing” Zealotry

“That is Zealotry from the right”  – Geraldo Rivera

Click the link below to view a very recent clip of Geraldo and Bill O’Reilly discussing the coverage of the Trayvon Martin shooting.  I agree completely with Geraldo’s take on the deplorability of the several news outlets which possessed proof Zimmerman sustained serious injury to the head during the altercation with Martin; people who have suffered head injuries know how hard one must hit their head on the ground to produce a several inch gash.  True to form most media outlets continued to report Mr. Zimmerman was unscathed during the altercation in order to keep stoking the “race fire”.  Al Sharpton abused and continues to abuse his national platform with MSNBC as do several other anchors on the network.  The Black Panther’s call for Zimmerman “dead or alive” including a $10,000 bounty has still went unaddressed by the Obama administration or the DOJ.  Last time I checked it is illegal to place a bounty on someone’s head [publicly or otherwise] unless of course the bounty is placed by law enforcement.

Zimmerman has been a hunted man since the first time Sharpton and the others flocked to the smell of Treyvon’s blood [rest his soul].  It was puzzling when Geraldo made an additional comment to O’Reilly about the inappropriateness of the $10,000 donation to the defense fund of George Zimmerman by the Texas Chapter of the NRA.  He asked O’Reilly [paraphrasing], “What possible reason could the NRA have to make this contribution?”   Geraldo then went on to say something that caught my attention immediately [not paraphrasing this time];

“That is Zealotry from the right.”

First and foremost the esteemed Geraldo had no way of knowing the intentions behind the NRA’s contribution/donation.  The National Rifle Association is a long standing organization with long standing rules and bylaws.  I am not privy to the group’s practices but I’m sure the chapter did not make such a sizable contribution without some sort of approval process.  Zimmerman is one of the most hunted men in America and thankfully someone, or group in the case of the NRA stepped up to help him with the upcoming battle whether innocent or guilty.  See… that is how this country is supposed to work no matter how Al Sharpton or the media wants it… innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

That fact alone makes the Texas Chapter of the NRA a great group of Americans.  By donating to Zimmerman’s defense fund they are supporting the way the United States governmental system is supposed to work.  The second reason the NRA has a vested interest in this case is because the anti-gun zealots instantly flocked to the scene of Teryvon Martin’s shooting like so many vultures.  A recent book by Katie Pavlich about Holder’s “Fast & Furious” program illustrates just how anti-gun the current president is; his deep anti-second amendment roots definitely answer a lot of questions about why he would chose to speak on a national platform about the shooting of a Florida boy before knowing any real facts about the case.  The NRA is here to defend our second amendment rights, so guilty or innocent… the NRA and all Americans have a vested interest in ensuring Zimmerman receives a fair trial.

There are just too many unanswered questions in the Treyvon Martin shooting and the question should be left to the courts to decide along with guilt or innocence. Pressure from groups like the NAACP to repeal the “Stand Your Ground” law in Florida over the Martin shooting does not make sense.  Their actions become completely nonsensical when one considers the NAACP also currently supports the “Stand Your Ground” law as a way to acquit in another Florida case involving a woman who shot her abusive husband [as illustrated in the previous about the NAACP].  There are far too many “hidden agendas” going on with the Martin shooting, remember Rahm Emanuel’s mission statement, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste”,  and Obama is one of his best pupils.

The NRA’s support of Zimmerman is welcomed.  Geraldo should really think before he speaks, I hope he was just reaching for straws and trying to prove there are radicals on both sides [absolutely true], but if he researched the “NRA” issue thoroughly then maybe he is losing touch.  Then again I remember watching his highly anticipated special as a kid… how bummed America was when Geraldo found nothing in Capone’s vault.  Thankfully “Pay-Per-View” wasn’t around in those days…

-Will Tell
Follow us on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012
Facebook   del.icio.us   MySpace   Google   Reddit   Windows Live   Yahoo! My Web   Gmail   Twitter   Linked in
Posted in Constitution, National News, Obama, Politics, Socialism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

NAACP Stands Ground on “Stand Your Ground” Law

Will Tell
Denver, CO

Follow on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012

NAACP Stands Ground on Stand Your Ground Law

Today according to Jacksonville.com the NAACP has again assumed a public stance on the Florida “Stand Your Ground” law only the position was opposite the organization’s screams over the Treyvon Martin shooting;

The NAACP’s Jacksonville chapter has thrown its support behind a woman who will be sentenced Monday in a shooting where she claimed self-defense against an abusive husband under the state’s Stand Your Ground law.

Read more at Jacksonville.com 

The odd thing is I remember the NAACP sang a much different tune over Zimmerman who was also involved in a Florida shooting and subject to the Stand Your Ground Law.  On the NAACP.org homepage I clicked a “Read More” link [pictured in screenshot] and was surprised to find a “glaring” contradiction;

 As a nation, we’ve got to address the issues of racial profiling and the valuation of black men’s lives by law enforcement. In the months ahead the NAACP and our allies in the civil rights community will continue to take these issues on as well as the urgent need to repeal stand your ground laws. Read More at the NAACP web site.

NAACP.org Zimmerman Link

Apparently the NAACP supports the stand your ground law when it is in the benefit of a black individual or against the benefit of a non-black.  What other conclusion can I come to?  The story of the Florida woman came out today.  The cite above from the NAACP.org site was sourced today.

I understand that I point out a lot of contradictions in this blog and that is simply the nature of the beast when dealing with politics and law; but I feel it is especially important to analyze all of what is stated on a public platform today because there are people who want to fundamentally change this country’s constitution via the amendment process… and they are making ground.  I am only examining their supporters, cohorts, and fringe groups.

Stay informed…

-Will Tell
Follow us on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012
Facebook   del.icio.us   MySpace   Google   Reddit   Windows Live   Yahoo! My Web   Gmail   Twitter   Linked in
Posted in National News, Politics, Socialism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What’s Crackin? Two Faced Chinese? Happy Birthday Hitler? Al “Not So” Sharpton!

Will Tell
Denver, CO



What’s Crackin? Two Faced Chinese? Happy Birthday Hitler? “Not So” Sharpton!

Saturday April 14, 2012 5:30PM (MST)TAGS: Eggless Chicken, North Koreans, Hitler, Occupy Wall Street, Al Sharpton
What’s Crackin?

What came first, the chicken or the egg?  The question has finally been answered in Sri Lanka.  According to BBC.com early this morning;

Unfortunately the “miracle” chick was not a miracle for the mother of the young chicken or much of a miracle at all.  It still came from an egg, it just hatched inside the mother.  A postmortem examination showed the mother’s reproductive tract was lacerated to the point it caused her death.  More of a fluke than a headline story but thats the news… 

Two Faced Chinese? 
Coming from the Voice of America News [voanews.com] today;

The Chinese are dangerous and the Russians are on the rise.  Communism was defeated by Reagan but recent administrations [George W. & Barack] have provided the opportunity for the cold war to start again.  Putin is no longer running things behind the scenes and has once again assumed a public position as the head of the Russian [or should I say “Soviet”] snake.  North Korea is arguably one of the most extreme “rouge nations” in the world.  All one has to do is analyze the behavior of other countries towards nations like N. Korea to see the truth.  China and Russia are both undertaking large infrastructure projects in the country many of which are intended to transport “cargo” in and out of the country.  


Happy Birthday Hitler?
One hundred and twenty three years ago Adolph Hitler was born.  Considering my feelings about Hitler and antisemitism I’m not really in the mood to wish the dead socialist happy birthday.  Check the “Occupy Walls St.” site though because there’s a chance they feel much differently about the man.  As “Occupy” continues to deny accusations of antisemitism their web-masters post an anti-Semitic cartoon on the movement’s Facebook site in honor of Holocaust Remembrance Day [as reported by the dailycaller.com].  Yes… “Occupy” is again showing its true colors.
It’s members and defenders say the movement is not anti-semitic but they are simply sheep, malcontents, and the homeless.  Many are in denial of what they represent and instead are in love with an ideology they do not understand.  An ideology which dates back to Plato and is void of individual sovereignty.  Maybe if Occupy’s followers took the time to read a little history or look deeper into current events their opinions would change… but ignorance is bliss.  As far as I can tell they are a bunch of classless people screaming because of envy, hatred, and jealousy… supported by the president and DNC.
Nancy Pelosi said [of the Tea Party] she was afraid of 1960’s style violence from a rouge group not that long ago.  No need to cite, it is a well known fact for anyone who would have an interest in reading this blog.  On the opposite side of the coin Pelosi told Christiane Amanpour of ABC in an exclusive interview she supported the message of “Occupy”. [Click for Source Article] There were allegations of “racism” with the Tea Party movement but the claims were never proven despite a half million dollar reward for proof.  Pelosi denounced the Tea Party movement despite no proof of violence or racism and a message of constitutionalism.
There have been countless documented cases of violence, rape, and other horrid crimes against humanity amongst the Occupy supporters and “camps” yet democrats ignore the disgusting events to push an agenda.  Pelosi openly supports the movement and even the president has made public statements in support of the anti-Semitic group  This illustrates how these people will say anything to the American people to take our individual liberty and lump us into classes they can rule.
Al “Not So” Sharpton!
Al Sharpton is in the news again.  Actually this is exactly where he likes to be as demonstrated by the use of his MSNBC platform to push his Treyvon Martin agenda.  Sharpton’s MSNBC platform is exactly what I wish to address.  As a new “personality” and “celebrity race-baiter” Al has a signifigant following.  Some of these people he has actually helped so the feel a great debt of gratitude for the man.  Other’s blindly follow an agenda, ideal, or even skin color.  Its a fact, call me what you want for putting it out there, but I’m talking about individuals not groups.  Regardless Sharpton has a following, a public forum, and in my mind…  a responsibility to be completely honest.  That is why I got excited when I heard Al repeatedly tout Obama’s Buffet Rule because that meant it was time to check into Sharpton’s tax situation.  Yay!
As I went to Google and searched for “Sharpton, Taxes” the information was plentiful.  A recent example was provided by the FreeBeacon.com;

This is typical behavior from the left.  I exposed the hypocrisy behind the Buffet Rule in an earlier blog.  This is a proposed law named after a man who is suing the federal government for charging him too much in taxes.  A man who makes more than his secretary just like the president; and just like the president he had the ability to structure his taxes differently.  These people are all “do as I say, not as I do”.  Keep watching what they do as opposed to listening to what they say. 

-Will Tell

Follow us on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012

Facebook   del.icio.us   MySpace   Google   Reddit   Windows Live   Yahoo! My Web   Gmail   Twitter   Linked in

Online Marketing
Add blog to our blog directory
Posted in National News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

More From Obama on Women’s Rights

Will Tell
Denver, CO


More from Obama on Women’s Rights

Saturday April 19, 2012 2:30PM (MST)

TAGS: Romney, Obama, Biden, Buffet, Reagan, Carter

Recently we have heard Obama demonize republicans over [#1] women’s rights and [#2] their attitude towards minority citizens [Treyvon Martin provided him ample opportunity for that].  We have heard countless spiels about Buffet paying a lower tax rate than his secretary, though Obama didn’t seem to have a problem arranging his taxes in a manner that would put him in a lower tax bracket than his own secretary, and recently the president has also said Reagan would have supported the Buffet rule.  Easy to say when the great leader is no longer with us but out of the 43 other presidents in US History– I think [and many agree] Reagan is on the opposite end of the spectrum from Obama.  “Carter would agree with the Buffet Rule” is probably a more accurate statement.  The American people could count on what Reagan said, he wasn’t a master of “spin”, and time and time again Obama has illustrated his ideology of hatred and trashing others to move ahead. 

In my last blog I explained how Obama would have never made it into the senate if not for trashing two opponents through the use of divorce records.  This methodology won Obama the democratic primary and eventually won him the senate race [thanks in large part to David Axlerod].  The president is smart because he typically sends his minions out to spread lies but he is losing touch and becoming too egotistical.  His latest stump on women’s rights is in far contrast to real life as I have shown with the man’s words vs. actions in several previous posts.  Now a report comes to us from the Washington Free Beacon;

Female employees in the Obama White House make considerably less than their male colleagues, records show.

According to the 2011 annual report on White House staff, female employees earned a median annual salary of $60,000, which was about 18 percent less than the median salary for male employees ($71,000) [Click for Source]

Again we see how what Obama does is in contrast to what he tells all of us to do.  We should all pay more in taxes than those in lower “classes” [no class warfare coming from this administration… sigh] but Obama structures his own taxes in a manner to pay a lower rate than his secretary.  Biden tells America they need to put more skin in the game yet donates less than 1.5% of his income to charity.  At least Obama got that one right as the president and his wife donated 22% of their income to charity.  Obama is criticizing republicans over women’s rights, Biden proclaims that republicans are encouraging domestic violence, yet this administration is no better. 

The domestic violence law Biden is fighting hard for right now is filled with additional garbage thrown in by the Obama administration.  “Leave no opportunity unexploited” should be their mission statement; 

“Reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act isn’t partisan,” said a statement from Sen. Chuck Grassley, who is pushing the GOP’s reform bill.

“Republicans are firmly committed to reauthorizing VAWA … [but] the bill that cleared the Judiciary Committee failed to address some fundamental problems, including significant waste, ineligible expenditures, immigration fraud and possible unconstitutional provisions,” Grassley said. [Click for Source] 

Why is there immigration fraud in a domestic violence against women law?  Let no opportunity pass unexploited.  Obama has shown no regard for the constitution when he threatened the supreme court.  He has also shown no regard for the truth.  It has recently been exposed the man who is demonizing republicans for their policies on women and minorities had a 2008 campaign team made up of mostly white males.  According to the Washington Free Beacon the “white-frat-boy” mentality flowed from the campaign into the White House; 

“Women are Obama’s base, and they don’t seem to have enough people who look like the base inside of their own inner circle,” former Clinton press secretary Dee Dee Myers told the New York Times.

In a 2011 article titled “The White House Boys’ Club: President Obama Has a Woman Problem,” TIME magazine’s Amy Sullivan detailed the president’s fondness for male-dominated environments.

“There’s a looseness to Obama when he’s hanging out with the boys club that doesn’t appear in co-ed gatherings,” she wrote. “The president blows off steam on the golf course with male colleagues and friends. He takes to the White House basketball court with NBA stars, men’s college players, and male cabinet members and members of Congress.”

As a presidential candidate in 2008, Obama was criticized for paying the women on his campaign staff less than the men, and far less than GOP opponent John McCain paid his female staffers. [Click for Source] 

This is not the type of man I want representing my interests.  After almost four years the lies are continuing to be exposed… don’t wait eight years to find out just how much he has destroyed the liberty and individual sovereignty of the American citizen.  Vote (R) in November.  Romney may not be conservative enough, he may not be of a religious background most people understand, but there is one thing I do know… he is not Obama or the Obama administration. 

-Will Tell
Follow us on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012

Facebook   del.icio.us   MySpace   Google   Reddit   Windows Live   Yahoo! My Web   Gmail   Twitter   Linked in

Posted in Biden, Obama | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

P.E.T.A. “Excuses” Obama for Eating Dog Meat

Will Tell
Denver, CO


P.E.T.A. ‘Excuses’ Obama for Eating Dog Meat

Saturday April 14, 2012 5:30PM (MST)


P.E.T.A. is in the news again and that is just where they like to be.  In the best seller “Dreams from My Father” Obama discusses eating dog meat as a child in Indonesia.  Today P.E.T.A. made a public statement excusing Obama for eating dog meat because he was just a child.  Apparently even the president of the United States must comply with these animal rights nazis’ way of thinking so I’m sure old Barack feels much better now that he has been pardoned.  Obama needs all of the radical fringe groups he can grab because this election cycle will not be about anything positive.  Barack cant tout his record so it will be about negative attack ads against Romney [and we already got a taste of Romney’s campaign strategy in the republican primary].  Even Barney Frank has bailed on healthcare reform saying Obama pushed his ideology too hard. 
Yes… I’m sure the president is flattered by his P.E.T.A. get out of jail free card but who exactly is P.E.T.A. and what do the stand for?  According to the DailyCaller.com;

“A child has an excuse, but grownups all should know by now the disgusting condition of slaughterhouses and fear and suffering that animals endure on factory farms and try a vegetarian diet that’s good for them, animals, and the environment,” Nicole Dao, a spokeswoman for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, told The Daily Caller. (Click for Source)

Ms. [or Mrs.] Dao  made mention of the fear and suffering animals endure on “factory farms” and that is a great point.  P.E.T.A. ran shelters slaughter 95% of the animals they take in only difference is the shelters adopt out a mere 5% of “rescued” animals.  In addition in a world where starvation is widespread the P.E.T.A. shelters don’t make use of the meat…  The only difference is 5% of the animals make it out of P.E.T.A. shelters and at least these other “slaughterhouses” actually utilize the meat.  But P.E.T.A. gets a pass?  Again, according to the DailyCaller.com;

Fifteen years’ worth of similar records show that since 1998 PETA has killed more than 27,000 animals at its headquarters in Norfolk, VA.

In a February 16 statement, the Center said PETA killed 1,911 cats and dogs last year, finding homes for only 24 pets.

“PETA hasn’t slowed down its slaughterhouse operation,” said Rick Berman, CCF’s executive director. “It appears PETA is more concerned with funding its media and advertising antics than finding suitable homes for these dogs and cats.”

In a statement, Berman added that PETA has a $37 million dollar annual budget […thirty seven million per annum and the only managed to adopt out 24 pets, thats over a million per pet].

His organization runs PETAkillsAnimals.com, which reports that in 2010 a resident of Virginia called PETA and asked if there was an animal shelter at the group’s headquarters. PETA responded that there was not.

The thing most radical fringe groups like P.E.T.A. agree upon is hypocritical behavior.  P.E.T.A. spends millions of dollars per year on protests, marketing, and other useless activities as they literally slaughter thousands of “rescued” animals.  I could adopt out 24 animals on my own utilizing craigslist.com and a budget of $0.00 so I must ask… how ethical is this behavior towards rescued animals by People for the “Ethical” Treatment of Animals?  On average P.E.T.A. kills over five animals per day yet publicly condemns any person or group exhibiting the same behavior.  It makes sense to me why P.E.T.A. and Obama are such good bedfellows considering their similar behavior. 

Both share the idea the America is “broken” in some way, that others need to listen to them because they know better, and Obama and P.E.T.A. specialize in publicly trashing people or groups.  Recently Obama made a public statement regarding those who are paying attention to and criticizing Michelle Obama for policies she is forcing on the American public.  The president said [paraphrasing], “Attack me fine, but going after my wife is uncalled for.”  How quickly people like this forget about their own behavior.  

According to the Chicago Tribune during Barack’s 2004 senate race against Jack Ryan; 

In the Democratic primary, Obama found himself the overwhelming beneficiary when the campaign of former securities trader Blair Hull crashed in the aftermath of Hull’s release of court files from a messy divorce. Though Obama has been a passive beneficiary of Ryan’s latest problems [again Axelrod’s handiwork involving demanding the divorce records of an opponent to Obama], the Democrat’s campaign worked aggressively behind the scenes to fuel controversy about Hull’s filings [a fellow democrat… they finally found a man willing to do anything to advance his agenda].

My point in all of this is to expose the real Obama.  He has tremendous influence over the media and George Soros’ money had a lot to do with that.  Soros recently gave NPR [National Public Radio] millions to “place a NPR reporter in every major metropolitan city” so as to influence political news nationwide.  According to a piece found on CanadaFreePress.com;

The left-wing Open Society Foundations is donating the large sum to NPR for a project being called “Impact of Government.” The project is planning to add at least 100 reporters across the country to cover local state house politics to fill the holes left by the firing of so many local reporters due to the contraction in the field of journalism over the last decade. (Click for Source)

  A NPR official stated this was “enterprise journalism” and as CanadaFreePress.com pointed out… “enterprise journalism” as opposed to what? “Honest” journalism or “non-agenda driven” journalism?  Soros’ money makes me nervous because the man is an unrepentant nazi conspirator who in a CBS interview spoke of taking his fellow Hungarian jews property and turning it over to his Nazi handlers [direct from MediaMatters.com which is a George Soros media entity that has been shown spinning news on almost fraudulent levels];

Soros: “Well, of course, … I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was — well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in the markets — that is I weren’t there — of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would – would — would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the — whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the — I had no role in taking away that property [just following orders like a good foot soldier ‘eh George]. So I had no sense of guilt.” (Click to Visit MediaMatters.com)

Apparently Obama and Soros had a falling out because of Obama’s inaction to make big changes Soros envisioned for America.  Apparently a government takeover of 17% of every dollar spent in this country was not enough for Soros.  Despite this fallout I cannot see Soros supporting any candidate other than Obama and I predict his donation will be in the maximum per individual range.  Worse, Soros and the Obama administration will continue to influence the news in this country with bullying and intimidation.  Journalist Katie Pavlich recently published a book about Obama’s “Fast & Furious” nightmare and exposed multiple examples of “freedom of the press” being trampled by his administration.  Apparently when Obama’s “people” don’t like an article or report by a journalist nothing is off limits including repeated calls to the journalist who them must listen to another Obama official literally cuss them out during a tirade.  If that is not intimidation of the media and a crime against this country then I don’t know what is. 

At the end of the day Obama can have P.E.T.A. because they are just “his speed”.  He will still get Soros’ money simply because he is the incumbent and a democratic with very radical views.  In 2003 Soros pledged his time and entire fortune to defeating George W. Bush; Soros is not all powerful because we saw who won the election.  Republicans, conservatives, independents, and democrats/liberals who still believe in the sanctity of the constitution must band together because these thugs have no regard for our founding documents.  Obama has been quoted criticizing the constitution but his actions over the last 3 plus years as president have shown there is no level he will not stoop to including making threats against the supreme court simply because a few justices questioned the constitutionality of Obamacare.  The man is no president, no statesman, and must be defeated in November.  We must all dedicate our time because those who want to fundamentally change our society have their “war paint” on.  Time to teach them how it feels to be scalped… politically speaking. 

-Will Tell
Follow us on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012

Facebook del.icio.us MySpace Google Reddit Windows Live Yahoo! My Web Gmail Twitter Linked in

(click for source)

Posted in Obama, PETA, Politics, Soros | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The TRUTH About Obama Tax Policy

Will Tell
Denver, CO


The TRUTH About Obama Tax Policy

Saturday April 14, 2012 5:30PM (MST)
TAGS: Obama, Tax Policy, Joe Biden, Warren Buffet

We have heard a lot about the travesty of Buffet paying a lower tax rate than his secretary… but how representative of the FACTS is this statement?  Obama claims to represent the middle class, to look out for the little guy, and the rich are not paying their fair share.  Their fair share…  Warren Buffet is perfectly happy touting Obama’s “game plan” as he declares (paraphrasing), “It’s not fair, I should have to pay a higher tax rate than my secretary.”  

Buffet can pay more in taxes so I don’t understand that part of his statement.  If he feels that he should pay more in taxes the government will definitely not turn down his money.  I was under the impression that Buffet had the tax resources and representation to understand that he is not forced to take all of the deductions he utilizes.  His “tax team” carefully prepared his taxes and arrived right at the rate Buffet pays [with Buffet’s full knowledge I’m guessing].  To put it simply, Buffet acknowledges that he should pay more taxes to be “fair”; but the only way he will act fairly is if the government forces him to?  I would guess his business practices are the same.  

Does he have the moral compass not to screw clients or the competition without government intervention?  Apparently his compass is broken because Buffet, the man who says he doesn’t pay enough in taxes, is currently [RIGHT NOW] engaged in a lawsuit with the IRS over being charged “too much” in taxes.  According to the Wall St. Journal, “NetJets, a unit of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., this week sued the Internal Revenue Service over what it called an “illegal” $643 million tax assessment” (Click For Source).  

In regards to Buffet’s dedication to paying his fair share one should look at Berkshire Hathaway as well.  In August of 2011 the Huffington Post revealed some contradictory facts about Buffet’s company;

Berkshire Hathaway, the eighth-largest public company in the world according to Forbes, openly admits to still owing taxes for years 2002 through 2004 and 2005 through 2009, according to the New York Post. The company says it expects to “resolve all adjustments proposed by the US Internal Revenue Service” within the next year. (Click For Source) 

The truth about this contrived “secretary controversy” is in the capital gains tax.  There has been a bipartisan effort to attack capital gains for a very long time.  The two sides of the isle agree on one thing… they want American investors to keep less of their money.  Unlike the “little guy” who Obama claims to be “looking out for”, Mr. Buffet makes a significant amount of money from investments which are subject to a much lower tax bracket.  If all or most of the income Buffet claimed in 2011 was from his “paychecks” -as was the case with his secretary- Buffet’s income would be taxed at 40%.  His secretary did NOT make a majority of her income from investments and was therefore taxed at a higher rate than 15%.  The administration and Buffet are purposefully spinning the facts to confuse people who don’t understand investing as well as Mr. Buffet.  They don’t realize Obama is really saying “tax investments [which have laready been taxed for the most part] at more than 15%”.  

The talk of Buffet’s secretary is all spin but don’t take my word for it, according to the New York Post via the Huffington Post;

The [New York] Post contends that since the majority of his [Buffets] income comes from dividends and capital games — taxed indirectly through the corporate income tax — “his effective rate would really be well north of 40 percent for a big chunk of his income” (Click for Source)

Obama’s “top man on taxes” from the private sector; 

(Click for Photo Source)
#1.  Buffet stands on a public platform and said he doesn’t pay enough in taxes; behind the scenes he is suing the IRS for… yes, charging him too much in taxes. 

#2. Obama’s “expert” on what Americans should pay in taxes, Warren Buffet, is head of the eighth largest corporation in the world.  A corporation which has not paid taxes (otherwise known as delinquent on taxes) in nearly a decade.  But Berkshire Hathaway is planning on getting everything straightened out NOW that the company is in the public spotlight. 

#3.  The whole premise behind the Warren Buffet/secretary “pitch” from the Obama administration in recent months is based on misleading information.  Information that many of the “little guys” Obama claims to represent have little or no understanding of because they are not investors.  The entire presentation is meant to spur class warfare and yes… it is absolutely socialist.  A page out of the Communist Manifesto if I have ever seen it. THE WORKERS MUST RISE. 

Does that sum it up?  Buffet is the man Obama has chosen to help tout his tax policy…  A hypocrite who is misrepresenting facts to advance an agenda and spur class warfare…  Buffet is not the only hypocrite in the midst of Obama either.  Actually, one need not even travel outside of the president’s inner circle to find interesting and hypocritical behavior… the Vice President Joe Biden fits the bill nicely. 

Upper income levels are filled with all types of people.  There are those who are incredibly selfless and give to charity relentlessly; there is also the type of upper income earner who gives “just enough” to keep up appearances.  For example, according to the Weekly Standard in 2011 the Obama’s gave 22% of their adjusted gross income to charity whereas the vice president Joe Biden and his wife gave a less than 1.5% (Click for Source).  One would think in an election year Biden would be particularly sensitive to issues like charity but it shows the arrogance of the Obama administration.  It doesn’t stop there with Biden either… actually he is quite enterprising.  According to the WhiteHouseDossier.com;

Most high-profile people in need of protection pay people to keep them safe. Government officials are allowed to have taxpayers pick up the tab. Biden is unique in that he actually gets paid by his bodyguards for the right to protect him.

Biden’s tax records list rental income of $20,900 from a “cottage” on is property, which is reportedly being leased by the Secret Service and paid for at a rate that could earn him even more money next year. (Click for Source) 

(Click for Photo Source)

If I understood the White House Dossier correctly then the man who is telling all of America to put “more skin in the game” in making money off his CIA protection detail [unprecedented behavior].  The security detail is paid for by the tax payer as well as Biden’s salary, sick pay, and any other career related expense the career politician incurs during his drain on society.  But Biden needs rent if they are going to stay on his property in an otherwise vacant “cottage”?  Seems fair to me… The American people on the other hand should be incredulous, the media should be up in arms, but do we hear any of this???  No.  There are a few voices out there on talk radio and such but for the most part the truth is no longer relevant to the American media.  Lies and abuse of privilege means nothing to this crew of thugs as Obama has shown himself.  

His latest “pitch” to the public is that he “needs” to be subject to the proposed “Buffet Rule”.  According to Obama’s own statement the government allows him hundreds of thousands of dollars that he does not need.  First of all, if one has hundreds-of-thousands of dollars in disposable income they want to throw away… they do not have to take all of their tax deductions.  Nobody is holding a gun to any tax filer’s head and forcing them to take deductions… not as far as I know.  Now that I’m no longer confused about how deductions “work”… sigh, I would like to address another issue critical to the hundreds of thousands of dollars Obama makes and doesn’t need.  Most people cannot afford to give 22% of their adjusted gross income to charity and then still brag about hundreds of thousands of unneeded dollars laying about. 

Most American’s who earn $800,000+ per annum like Obama are not Community Organizers, senators, or the president of the United States for a living.  With that said many Americans in the $800,00 per annum income range are small business owners with very high overhead.  I know that Obama cannot fathom how a small business owner can make nearly $1 million dollars in a year yet still barely scrape along… but it happens every day all across this great nation.  Obama fails to see this because he was never a small business owner or responsible for a any businesses’ profit and loss statement as a “Community Organizer”, which is what?  An organizer of malcontents?  It’s easy to find dissatisfaction in a free society.  

There are always those who want something for free and those who will say anything for a vote but the point is Obama does not have the fundamentals for business, tax regulation, or many of the other priorities he hires advisers for.  To be in the Obama administration one must be a radical as illustrated with Van Jones and that means those creating tax policy for the president are very radical people with radical views of how the economy works.  Views that are easy to convinve the president of.  We saw that as Obama made his case for a second stimulus [since the first stimulus and TARP created so many jobs for all of us].  Now Obama’s latest misleading statement is about the “Buffet Rule”. 

Our president feels he “should” be subject to the proposed “Buffet Rule” because he makes hundreds of thousands of dollars he doesn’t need?  We have all heard him say this multiple times yet the truth of the matter is he would not fall under the “Buffet Rule’s” regulation because his annual income is $100,000+ too little.  He knows this, anyone who takes the time to look at his tax records [which he made public] will see that he does not qualify for the proposed legislation, but his speeches continue to tout how the Obama’s should fall under the “Buffet Rule” to pay THEIR fair share.  He is counting on the voter to not do their homework and calling the average American stupid.  Speaking of Buffet, president Obama has something else in common with the billionaire.  Obama was also taxed at a lower rate than his secretary but I haven’t heard him bragging about that tiny fact.  According to the L.A. Times on April 13th;

As President Obama mounts an aggressive campaign on what he calls tax fairness, his own tax burden has fallen to the lowest of his time in the White House, lower than many who make far less — including his secretary. (Click for Source) 

As the spin from the White House regarding Obama tax policy pours from the media it is important to look at what is really happening and question everything that is said… and not said.  Over the last few weeks Obama has repeated that Buffet pays more than his secretary but the truth of the matter is so does Obama.  The misrepresentation of the income/capital gains facts are an example of blatant class warfare.  We have heard the president tell us repeatedly that we all need to chip in, I believe I head Biden say the American people all need “skin in the game”, yet the actions of all say the opposite.  At least Biden “keeps it real” and didn’t modify his “cheap” behavior from previous years.  

NOTE: The Obama’s income places them in the top 1% of income earners but I hear no grumbling from the Occupy Wall Street people against the president either… I mean Obama is the definition of who they hate right?  The top 1% of American earners who keep hundreds of thousands needlessly instead of handing it over to the government?

All of the rhetoric begins to unravel when one takes the time to verify facts and not take a politicians “word” for what is happening.  NOW… let’s take a look at what Obama is REALLY doing to taxes in this country;

—BUSH TAX CUTS:  Obama adamantly opposes the Bush Tax cuts and though the president and his wife do not qualify for the “Buffet Rule”… they will definitely fall under the Bush Tax cuts and benefit from any extension thereof. 
According to the Washington TImes on December 30, 2011:  The Affordable Care Act – also known as Obamacare – contains 21 new or higher taxes on the American people. Eight of the tax hikes have already gone into effect, and a year from now five more will take force.

— In January 2013, Obamacare will impose a medical-device tax on everything from pacemakers and prosthetic limbs to hospital beds and CT scanners. [THIS HAS ALREADY COST 1,000 JOBS]

— In 2013, Obamacare will saddle the economy with a 3.8 percent surtax on capital gains and dividend income and a 3.8 percent Medicare payroll tax on all wages and profits exceeding $200,000 per year.

— The new Obamacare tax hikes hitting in 2013 will continue to restrict consumer-driven health care options with the imposition of a federal government cap of $2,500 on Flexible Spending Accounts. Currently, these pre-tax accounts do not have federal contribution limits, allowing individuals and families with high medical costs to plan ahead.

— The new 2013 FSA cap [mentioned above, item #C) comes on the heels of Obamacare’s 2011 medicine-cabinet tax, which prevents millions of people from using their flex accounts and Health Savings Accounts to purchase over-the-counter medicines [in plain English Obama has taken all the money from OTC drug manufacturers and handed it right over to the people he claims to hate… big pharmaceutical companies]. Because Americans are no longer allowed to use these pre-tax accounts to buy hundreds of qualified products like pain relievers, antihistamines and cough medicine, every trip to the drugstore now costs more.
— The fifth and final Obamacare tax taking effect in 2013 will be the “haircut” to the medical itemized deduction. Currently, those facing significant medical expense are allowed a deduction to the extent total health expenses exceed 7.5 percent of one’s adjusted gross income.Courtesy of Obamacare, the threshold will rise to 10 percent, increasing the tax burden on Americans with the highest medical bills. (Click for Source, GREAT article!)

According to USNews.com on February 15, 2011; 

The Internal Revenue Service says it will need an battalion of 1,054 new auditors and staffers and new facilities at a cost to taxpayers of more than $359 million in fiscal 2012 just to watch over the initial [the INITIAL] implementation of President Obama’s healthcare reforms. Among the new corps will be 81 workers assigned to make sure tanning salons pay a new 10 percent excise tax. Their cost: $11.5 million.

According to a 2011 report on Obamacare by the C.A.T.O. Institute and Michael D. Tanner, “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act imposes more than $569 billion in new or increased taxes over the first 10 years. These include;”
Tax on “Cadillac” Insurance Plans.

Payroll tax hike.        
Tax on Investment Income.
Limit on Itemized Deductions.
Tax on Prescription Drugs
Tax on Medical Devices [as. 
Additional Taxes on Insurers.
Tax on Tanning Beds

The point is Obamacare will be a huge burden on the tax payer in years to come.  The real punch will come down the road when paychecks are significantly less because of additional Obamacare Taxes “kicking in” and everyone’s healthcare is something less than or equal to medicare and medicaid.  The two government programs [which are headed for bankruptcy] will be watered down and distributed to every American or alleged American.  We have seen how hard liberals fight against agendas requiring proof of citizenship to receive welfare benefits or vote; I won’t cite that statement because examples of welfare and voter fraud are rampant across the nation.  

Many scoff at the idea Mr. Obama is a socialist or at least turning the United States more towards socialism than away.  The fact of the matter is Obamacare was a government takeover of 17% of the United States economy.  More so the 2,700 page legislation creates commerce with the intention of regulating said commerce.  Every citizen is forced to participate in this market or they are “fined” [because we can’t call it a tax… or that would upset people] and that is against the constitutional rights of every citizen in the United States.  Several supreme court justices pointed out the unconstitutionality of the law and Obama came out with “threats”, YES I said THREATS against the supreme court (Click for Source, read for yourself).  

To those who scoff at the concept that Obama can be a socialist I say please look at what is going on around you.  Seventeen cents of every dollar spent in the United States will now be regulated by the federal government because of Obamacare; when the supreme court hinted at the unconstitutionality of the law Obama called them an extremist court and threatened/warned the court against striking down the law.  It is unlike anything I have ever seen.  I can’t say for sure if the agendas of Obama’s are socialist because I am not in the man’s head… but I know for sure his actions are not American. 

-Will Tell
Follow us on Twitter: Will_Tell_2012

(click for source)

Posted in Biden, Obama, Politics, Socialism, Tax Policy, Warren Buffet | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments